cband calibration
aug,2002
The cband receiver covers 3.95 to
6.05 Ghz. It is a native linear receiver with the option to create
circulars using a hybrid in the iflo cabinets.
Sections:
History
Recent
system
performance measurements
Daily
monitoring
of Tsys
Dewar
temperatures
Calibration measurements
Miscellaneous
cal
values
History:
- 200210: PolB problem is a
gain oscillation at the crosshead frequency.
- 191212: Polb Tsys jumps up.
- 190501: postmaria gain fits
for cband.
- 11-19mar19: polB loose bias cable on 1st
stage amp.
- 27jul16:
installed new cal values measured back on 28apr16
- 11oct14: polA back to good bias card. polB "bad". polB
stage2 now driven by stage 4 of card?
- 10oct14: swap stage2 pola,b bias cards. oscillations moved to
polA.. so in card.
- 27sep14: polB stage2 current starts having large oscillations.
- 11feb13: cband reinstalled in dome
- 05feb13: cband brought to lab. PolB
instabilities. tied to crosshead rate. wacking on dewar also
causes variations. Something loose inside.
- 13jan13: updated pointing offsets
- 18oct12: cb warmed up, opened up in the dome. polA Found bad
elbow between circulator and lna. replaced. Then
reinstalled the the old lna (#19).
- 25sep12: new amplifier (18.. old Amp #19) installed in
polA to see if polA problems go away. Looks like this amp has
problems.
- 27aug12: cband bias box replaced with sbh bias box.
- 21aug12: stage 2 polA now driven from stage 3 power.
- jul12: polA still showing instabilities.
- 14may12: dewar brought down to the lab to fix oscillations
from crosshead in polA,.
- 9,10may12: biases adjusted
- 09may12. biases adjusted, causes stage2 polA drain current
to start jumping around
- 10may12: stage 2 polA now driven from stage 3. rms for stage
2 drain current gets worse.
- 01nov10-17nov10
- : gortex cover comes loose, moisture gets into mouth of
horn.
- Tsys goes up. repaired and back to normal on 17nov10.
- 28aug06: new cband
cal
values installed (measured back in jul06).
- 06jul06: remeasured the cal values. Needed from the 25may06
tightening of pola.
- 25may06: Found that sma connector for polA cal was loose. Cal
had jumped back on 02feb06. After tightening, the Tsys did not
jump back to the pre 02feb06 value. So tightening changed the
amount of cal that was getting in before the jump.
- 02feb06: cal polA jumped (turned out to be loose sma connector
for cal).
- jun05: built polbox to switch between linear and circular. I
don't think it was installed very long.
- 10jun05: cal values measured using sky and absorber. backdated
to 25may05
- 25may05: new amplifiers installed in cband receiver.
- 24may04 to 08oct04 pola tsys jumping around.. a bias line for
the led's inside the dewar was shorting out.
- 16may03: cal values measured using sky and absorber. back
dated to 05may03.
- 05may03 cal cable tightened.
- 22apr03 new cal diodes installed.
- 28aug02 horn moved down 1.08" to put phase center at the
correct position.
- 22jan01: cal values measured using sky and absorber.
Calibration
measurements:
11feb13: calibration run after dewar reinstalled
in the dome.
13jan13:
calibration results: jun12-dec12. updated pointing offset.
02jul09:
tsys
vs freq for entire band.
may05-oct05: cband GAIN
CURVES.
may05-oct05: System
performance of data used for gain curves.
may03-mar04: cband GAIN
CURVES.
may03-mar04: System
performance of data used for gain curves.
Aug02-Dec02:
cband
GAIN
CURVES.
aug02-dec02:
System performance: Gain,Tsys,Sefd.. using calibration runs.
08aug02: horn moved
down 1.08" to put phase center at focus.
sep01-aug02:
cband GAIN CURVES.
sep01-aug02: System
performance:Gain,Tsys,Sefd... using calibration runs.
22dec01:
cband
sefd,pointing errors (preview)
02aug01:
gain/sefd after panels in the northern half of the dish adjusted
28jun01:
gain/sefd on 3C48 after SE quad of dish adjusted
27jun01:
gain/sefd
with pitch,roll,focus correction after SE quad adjusted
jan01:
calibration after 1st surface adjustment
sep00: calibration runs
Miscellaneous:
200210: Tsys PolB problem is
dewar gain dropout at the crosshead frequency.
191212: Tsys polB jumps up on 12dec19
190501: post maria gain fits.
19mar19: 11-19mar19 polB gain jumps. loose bias
cable.
27jul16:
installed new cal values measured back on 28apr16
15jun15: added page describing cband
polbox from 2005
13apr14: p2865 4-5 ghz, average spectra and
rms/mean
05jun13:
5-6 Ghz on the telescope after 5020 rfi turned off.
04jun13:
2nd trip to yiyi's tower. Source of 5020 rfi.
02feb13: polB instability at crosshead freq.
Stage 2 drain current.
26sep12: sefd ratio PolA/PolB after new amp
installed
cband instabilities 2012
09feb11: look at
cband,iflo stability with the shutter closed.
19nov10: Tsys increases when horn gortex fabric
cover comes loose.
27sep04: oscillations/jumping around of
Tsys in polA
29jul02:
resonances
in the cband omt 29jul0
07jun02:
Polarized
Tsys vs azimuth,za
190501: Post maria gain
curves. jan18-apr19
x102 calibration data 01jan18 thru 30apr19 was
used to fit gain curves for the cband receiver. These curves
reflect the degraded gain after hurricane maria.
The gain curves were installed in the system 01may19. They
are valid for the period starting 01dec2017 (after hurricane
maria).
Previous fits only used za terms. The current
fits included azimuth dependence.
gain= c0 + c1*(za-10) + c2*(za-10)^2 +
c3*(za-10)^3 +
c4*cosAz + c5*sinAz + c6*cos2az + c7*sin2az + c8*cos3az +
c9*sin3az.
Curves were fit separately to the frequencies: 4500, 4860, 5000, and
5385 Mhz,. There were a total of 1987 points over the 4 frequencies
(average of 500 pnts/freq).
For a point to be included in the fit:
- tsys between 20 and 50 K
- gain > 1 K/Jy
- beam width < 95 asecs
- pointing error (in az or za) less than 35 asecs
- eta main beam < .45.
- the sources B0710+118 and B0838+133 were excluded (extended,
and source flux inaccurate at 5ghz).
System performance plots for fit data:
The first set of plots show the system
performance plots for the data used for the fit (.ps) (.pdf)
- page 1: az, za coverage
- page 2: gain,tsys,sefd and bmwidth
- page 3: coma, sidelobe level, eta mb, eta mb+1st sidelobe
- page 4: point error (from the 2d gauss fit).
Fit results:
The plots show the fit results
(.ps) (.pdf)
- Page 1: az,za distribution for the data.
- Page 2: input data gain vs za (red), and fit results evaluated
at each input data point (black)
- frames 1-4 are the 4 separate frequencies
- for each frame the sigma and fit coef are printed,.
- the fit residuals:
- 4500Mhz: .42 Jy
- 4860 MHz:.41 Jy
- 5000 MHz: .42 Jy
- 5385 MHz: .42 Jy
- Page 3: fit residuals vs za
- each source is a separate color
- Page 4: fit residuals vs az
- Page 5: arrow plot gain vs az,za
- The length of the arrow is proportional to the measured
gain. 1 tick mark is 2K/Jy
- The vector rotation angle is proportional to the gain
- 0deg (up) is 6 K/Jy
- 90deg (right) is 3.5 K/Jy
- 180deg(down) is < 1K/Jy
- The southern part of the dish has much lower gain.
- Page 6: arrow plot of fit residuals (data -fit)
- the rotation angle is proportional to the fit residual in
Jy.
- 0deg = 0 K/Jy residual
- 90deg: .8 K/Jy
- 180deg:1.5 K/Jy
- clockwise, residual > 0 , ccw: residual < 0
- the two points pointing down at low za should probably be
excluded, it's hard to fit at za around 2deg..
The routine gainget() or corhgainget() will now
return the cband gain for data after 01dec17 from these equations.
The coefficients can be found in the ascii file
data/gain.datR9 (this is provided in the AO
idl
distribution for correlator routines). You can also find a
copy of it at AO in gain.datR9.
A description of the gain curves can be
found at:
gaincurves:
processing: x101/cb/apr19/doit.pro,dogainfit.pro
19mar19: polB gain jumps. loose bias cable.
plots:
the bias currents for 18feb19
thru 18mar19 (.pdf)
daily tsys measurements for cband
18feb19-18mar19 (.ps) (.pdf)
a3123 tsys vs freq for
12-15mar19 (.ps) (.pdf)
Tests done tracking the moon at cband
(18mar19) showed polB jumps of many db in the cband gain.
The jumps were upstairs, since the upstairs power meter showed the
power in polB increasing.
Testing the rf attenuator showed no problem. Felix looked at the
cband bias and saw jumps in polB bias current for stage 1.
The plot shows the
bias currents for 18feb19 thru 18mar19 (.pdf)
- The black trace is polA, the red trace is polB.
- topFrame: stage 1 amp
- You can see the red polB trace going low around 11mar19
while the polA trace remains level
- The polB trace is going off the plot, (but it is not going
to 0).
- the low values of both traces around 20feb19 was when the
lna's were turned off.
- 2ndFrame: stage 2 amp
- bottomFrame: there is no stage 3 amp
The 2nd plot shows the daily tsys measurements for cband
18feb19-18mar19 (.ps) (.pdf)
- The dashed lines are polB Tsys.
- there were a few days (around 17mar) when the tsys polB jumped
back down to it's normal value.
Project a3123 was using cband to do position
switching and drift scans on different objects.
I used the a3123 cal on off data from 12-15mar19 to see how their
observations were affected.
The plots show a3123 tsys
vs freq for 12-15mar19 (.ps) (.pdf):
- The black + are polA. the red + are polB
- The Tsys for polB was high for the entire time.
- The polB stage 1 current was low for the entire time (except
for 2 short jumps up).
- The polB Tsys was about 10 degK higher than normal.
Resolution:
- On 19mar19 in the afternoon, felix went up and found the loose
bias cable.
- The polB Tsys came back to its regular value (near that of
polA).
- people using cband 11mar19 till 19mar19 (afternoon) will see a
polB tsys about 10K higher than normal.
- If people were unlucky (like myself observing the moon
18mar19) they could have gain jumps (of many db) in polB
processing: x101/190319/cbpolBjumps.pro
13apr14:p2685 spectra and rms's using 4-5
ghz (top)
p2685 took full stokes data with the mock
spectrometer covering 3985 to 5055 using the cband
receiver.
the setup was:
- 7 mock spectrometers. Each with:
- 32 channels, 16 bit spectra, 170 Mhz bandwidth, 3.9 usecond
spectral average
- psrfits data files recorded (2gb each)
processing the data:
- I looked at files 700 thru 791 (this covered about 46 minutes
of data).
- For each file i computed;
- the average spectra for the entire file (30 seconds of data)
- The average spectra for each row of the file (.3 seconds of
data)
- using the row averages, the rms/mean for each channel was
computed for each file
- From the radiometer equation this should be 1/sqrt(170e6/32
*.39) = .0007
- The measured values (away from rfi ) was about .0008
- There were 7 170Mhz bands.
- The first two were increasing frequency (even number
of high side lo's)
- the last 4 bands had decreasing freqency (odd number of high
side los)
- After the processing i flipped the last 4 bands so they all
had increasing frequency.
The first plots show the average
spectra for the entire 46 minutes (.ps) (.pdf)
- The dashed vertical lines show the center of each band
- since this is complex sampling, there is a DC spike in the
center of the band.
- Top: avg spectra polA(black) and polB (red) vs
cumulative channel number
- channels go 0-31 for band 1, 32-63 for band 2 .. etc
- the center of bands 3-6 is shifted 1 to the left (flipping
the spectra does this).
- 2nd: spectral density for stokes U,V vs channel number
(this is the raw data out of the mocks, no mueller matrix has
been applied)l
- The spikes at dc show up in the cross spectra.
- 3,4th frames. Same thing as 1,2 but plotted vs frequency
- there was an overlap of a few channels on each band
- The left and rightmost bands are chopped off a little.
- The first IF filter is 1 Ghz wide. This data covers
1070 Mhz.
dynamic spectra using the power and the rms/mean
Dynamic spectra were made using the average power
of each file as well as the rms/mean for each file
- Dynamic spectra PolA,PolB
power vs channel number (.gif)
- Top: polA
- Bottom:polB
- the vertical scale is file number - 700. it covers about 46
minutes.
- The vertical dashed lines show the start of each band.
- each image has been divided by the median bandpass (so
constant tones will not be seen0)
- the channel number for bands 3-7 are for increasing
frequency.
- Dynamic spectra PolA,PolB
power vs frequency (.gif)
- the horizontal axis is freq
- there is a small error in the labels, since i used all 7*32
channels and didn't bother with the overlap. The plot is
labeled as minfreq to maxfreq over 32*7 channels.
- band 1- 400-4150 .. lots of junk
- 4200-4400 Mhz is aeronautical radio altimetry.
- Dynamic spectra rms/mean
vs channel number (.gif)
- top thru bottom is polA,polB, stokesU, stokesV
- This is much clearer than the power images since the
bandpass is removed (rms/mean by channel)
- the dashed vertical lines are the start of each band
- the central pixel of each band stands out (dc)
- Dynamic spectra rms/mean
vs freq (.gif)
- top thru bottom is polA,polB, stokesU, stokesV
- the horizontal axis is frequency (ignoring the overlap)
- Not sure what the junk is around 4600 Mhz.
processing:
x101/140413/p2865_joanna.pro, plotbms.pro
The cband receiver was reinstalled in the dome on
11feb13. A calibration run was done that evening (the receiver was
cold).
The setup was:
- calibration run 20:00 to 2:00 (12feb13)
- Used sources: B0600+219, B0758+143, B1040+123
- Source B0600+219 had been used on a previous
calibration run on 24jan13.
- Tiedown tracking with the
distomats started working about 21:18. (.ps) (.pdf)
- Top: kips in each td cable vs hour of day
- 2nd: tiedown position (inches) for the 3 tiedowns
(black=td12,red=td4,green=td8)
- bottom: avg platform height versus hour
- Data from the first source B0600+219 was used after 21:18
hours
The first set of plots show the
calibration results for 11feb13 (.ps) (.pdf):
- Page 1: gain, Tsys, sefd, average beam width.
- The gain for B0758+143 is 15% stronger than the other 2
sources below za==15deg,
- Page 2: coma, 1st sidelobe,beam efficiency, beam efficiency
(+1st side lobe)
- Page 3: pointing error, za Error vs za, az, az Error vs za Az
- za Error -5.95 mean, 3.33 rms asecs
- az ERror: -3.09 mean, 2.81 rms asecs
- The larger mean offset may be real, or they may be because
we haven't sample enough declinations.'
- Page 4: plot showing tracks across the dish
The 2nd set of plots compares the
source B0600+219 before and after the installation (.ps) (.pdf)
- Black * were taken 11 feb13 after the installtion
- red * were taken 24jan13 before cband was brought down to the
lab.
- Page 1:
- Gain,tsys,sefd,average beam width.
- The gain looks about the same (at the same za's)
- Tsys looks like it has increased a little in feb13.
- The sefd also looks higher in feb13 than jan13.
- Since the gain looks the same, and tsys and sefd are both
higher for 11feb13 then the this is probably not a cal
difference. Must be that Tsys was a little higher. This may
have been clouds since it had been raining till 21:00 on
11feb13.
- Page 2: coma, sidelobes, beam efficiency.
- coma looks a little higher 11feb13.
- Page 3: pointing errors zaErrors vs za,az, azErrors vs za,az
- Looking at the za errors vs az: feb13 za error is lower than
the values from 24jan13 (by about 5 asecs)
- Page 4: tracks across the dish with the two days overplotted
in different colors.
Summary:
- Tsys was a little higher for 11feb13 but it was probably
clouds.
- the pointing za mean offset is about 5asec less than
24jan13. We need to do a few more runs in the coming months to
see if this persists.
processing: x101/130211/x102cb.pro
02feb13: cband instabilities in polB.
On 02feb13 chris and tapasi reported an
instability in cband. They saw the band going up and down at about
.83 seconds. 1/.833 is 1.2 hz which is the crosshead frequency.
I looked at the x111 data taken 21:00 01feb13
as well as the dewar bias monitoring:
x111 cband data 01feb13
(.ps) (.pdf):
- page 1:
- the data is 60 1 second spectra taken with interim
correlator (25 Mhz Bw)
- black is pola, red is polB
- Page 2: total power vs time for the 60 spectra
- Top is polA, bottom is polB
- Page 3: the Fourier transform of the 60 seconds of power data.
- Top is pola, bottom is polb
- With 1 second sampling the maximum frequency is .5 hz.
- The .2 Hz peak in polB is actually the 1.2 Hz that chris and
tapasi saw (just aliased around).
cband bias monitoring (drain
current) jan-feb13 (.ps) (.pdf):
- Top 2 frames are polA,polB stage 1
- frames 3,4: polA, polB stage 2 drain currents.
- You can see that stage 2 polB started jumping around 23jan13
Summary:
- cband polB has an instability at the frequency of the
crosshead
- It is seen in the total power and in the stage 2 bias current.
- It has been active since 23jan13
processing:
x111/130202/cbandripple.pro
26sep12: SEFD ratio polA,polB after new
amp installed in polA
A new lna was installed in cband polA on
25sep12. After installation, Tsys for polA (at 5GHz) was running
about 40 K while Tsys for polB was about 30K.
This difference could be caused by:
- The cal value for polA is no longer correct. To go from 30 to
40 K the cal value would have had to decrease by about 30% from
what is currently used.
- The Tsys of the system has actually increased.
To check which of these has occurred, calibration scans were done on
26sep12:
- Sources: B1607+268, B1829+290. Both of these sources have no
polarized flux at lband (looking at nvss)
- For a linear feed, a polarized source will have the source
deflection change as a function of az (the probes line up with
the polarized direction).
- the SEFD: Tsys/(Tsrc/SrcFlux) measured Tsys/Gain. Since Tsys
and Gain use the calvalue, the ratio is independent of the cal
value used.
- By taking the ratio of SEFDPolA/SEFDPolB you can
tell whether the tsys change is real, or just the cal value
changing (this assumes the gain of the telescope has not
changed).
The plots show the results of the
calibration measurements (.ps) (.pdf):
- Page 1: results from 26sep12:
- 2 sources were used: B1607+268, B1829+290
- Top: Tsys vs za
- + is polA, * is polB
- the colors show different frequencies
- PolB Tsys is what it has been
- polA Tsys has increased by 6 to 35 K.
- The lower frequencies have the larger Tsys increase
- Tsys for the two sources is the same.
- Middle: SEFD polA,polB vs za
- SEFD for polA is 50% to 200% larger than polB
- The SEFD for the two sources is different. This is
probably because the flux values used are a little off
- Bottom: SefdA/SefdB
- Colors show different frequencies.
- the sources are differentiated by symbols.
- The ratio differs by 1.4 to 2.5
- Page 2: sefd ratio using data from 31may12 thru 31aug12
- Tsys for both pols is around 30K
- the sefd ratio is close to 1.
SUMMARY:
- the SEFDPolA/SEFDPolB varies from 1.4 to 2.5
- The measured Tsys polA,polB difference is real (not just a bad
cal value)
- The measured Tsys Ratio at 5Ghz was 40/30 = 1.3
- The SEFD ratio at 5Ghz is about 1.8. This may be
telling us that the cal values might also be different for
polA (maybe the match into the amp has changed?).]
- Any cal change will affect people using cband for stokes
measurement (esteban..)
processing: x101/120926/x102cb.pro
19Nov10: Tsys increases when horn gortex
fabric cover comes loose.
Tsys for the cband receiver increased from
30oct10 (polA 26K) to 13nov10 (polA 38K). It then decreased back to
26 K on 19nov10. After inspecting the feed it was found that the
gortex fabric horn cover had come loose. Water drops were found
inside the horn. The change in tsys was probably a function of how
much water precipitated on the the inside of the Horn. This would be
a function of the horn temperature and the dewpoint.
The top of the reciever is inside the gregorian
dome room which is air conditioned. The bottom part of the
receiver and the horn are under the rotary floor. This part is
not air conditioned.
The plots show the Tsys and gain variations for
this period (.ps) (.pdf):
- Page 1: Tsys vs data for Cband at 5Ghz
- black is polA, red is polb.
- Each minor tick mark is 5 days.
- There is some jumping around around 30oct10 to 04nov10
- It starts the steady increase on 07nov10 peaking
on 12nov10 at polA=41.4K
- It decreases back to 25-26K on 19nov10.
- On 19nov10 the cover was placed back on the horn (after
cleaning out the water droplets).
- Page 2: cband calibration runs: 17oct,15nov,16nov10.
- The dates are color coded
- top: the gains for individual sources are not changing
between the dates.
- 2nd: Tsys vs za. the 17oct10 data is about 10k less that the
15,16Nov data.
- 3rd: SEFD: For the same source,the 16nov data is greater
than the 17oct10 data by the same amount that Tsys has
increased. This shows that the problem was really with the
Tsys and not a change in the cal values.
Summary:
- The gortex fabric cover coming loose at the mouth of the horn
caused Tsys to increase by up to 25%.
- The increase, decrease of Tsys was probably a function of the
horn temperature and the dew point.
- The receiver has shown other periods where the Tsys has
increased and then decreased. It would be interesting to
correlate this with the gregorian room temperature and the
outside air dew point. It may be that the cover had been loose
for awhile.
processing:
x101/101119/cbandTsys.pro
May05 to oct05
fit GAIN CURVES to calib data. (top)
On 25may05 new amplifiers were installed in the
cband dewar. Calibration data was then taken from 25may05 through
31oct05 (see the cband
gain data ). Gain curves were then fit to the data. The
gain curves were installed in the system 22nov05.
The functional form used was:
gain= c0 + c1*(za-10) + c2*(za-10)^2 +
c3*(za-10)^3
Curves were fit separately to the frequencies:
4100,4400,4500,4700,4860,5000,5400,5690, and 5900 Mhz. There were a
total of 1774 points over the 9 frequencies (average of 200
pnts/freq). There was no attempt to fit to the azimuth dependence
because of a lack of azimuth coverage.
The plots
show
the gain data (black) and the fits (red) (.ps) (.pdf)
for the various frequencies:
- Fig 1 shows the az,za distribution for the data. This includes
all of the frequencies.
- Figs 2,3,4 plots the gain data and the fit to za. The
freq, fit sigma, and fit equation are printed below the plots.
- Figs 5,6,7 plot the fit residuals (data-fit) vs za.
The routine gainget() or corhgainget() will now
return the cband gain for data after 25may05 from these equations.
The coefficients can be found in the ascii file
data/gain.datR9 (this is provided in the AO
idl
distribution for correlator routines). You can also find a
copy of it at AO in /pkg/rsi/local/libao/phil/data/gain.datR9.
processing: x101/cb/may05/dogainfit.pro
May05 thru oct05
: System performance data used to compute gain curves. (top)
Heiles calibration scans done from
25may05 (after the new amps were installed) thru 31oct05 were
used to measure the system performance. This data was then
used to compute the gain curves for data taken after 25may05.
The first set of plots show the system
performance
with all frequencies over plotted (.ps) (.pdf).
The
sources are identified by symbol and the frequencies by color.
- Fig 1 shows the distributions on the dish of the measurements.
- Fig 2: Each frequency is in a different color. Symbols
differentiate sources.
- Top: the Gain in Kelvins/Jansky.
- 2nd: Tsys in Kelvins
- 3rd: System Equivalent Flux Density (SEFD) in Jy. This
is the size of a source needed to equal the system
temperature. The SEFD does not depend on the cal value
(Tsys/Gain).
- Bottom: The average beam width in arc seconds.
- Fig 3 plots the coma parameter, first sidelobe height below
the peak, the main beam efficiency, followed by the main beam +
1st sidelobe beam efficiency. The coma parameter measures the
asymmetry in the gaussian beam.
- Fig 3 has the pointing errors in az,za each plotted versus az
and za. Color is used to identify different sources.
The second set of plots has the
system performance plotted separately for each frequency (.ps)
(.pdf).
The
figures are:
Fig 1 4100 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 105 points
Fig 2 4100 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 3 4400 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 106 points
Fig 4 4400 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 5 4500 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 244 points
Fig 6 4500 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 7 4700 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 106 points
Fig 8 4700 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 1 4860 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 242 points
Fig 2 4860 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 1 5000 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 447 points. The source
B1645+174 looks like it has a bad cal value. The gain is high,
the Tsys is high, but the sefd was normal.
Fig 2 5000 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 1 5400 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 341 points
Fig 2 5400 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 1 5690 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 98 points
Fig 2 5690 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
Fig 1 5900 Mhz Gain,Tsys,sefd,bmwid. 98 points
Fig 2 5900 Mhz coma,sidelobes, beam efficiencies
processing: x101/cb/may05/doit.pro
27sep04 oscillations/jumping of
tsys in polA. (top)
The system temperature for polA has been
jumping around. On 24 sep04 data was taken with the radar
interface (ri). 40 Mhz around 4850 Mhz was detected with a 20
usecond time constant and sampled at 10 useconds. 90 seconds of data
was taken. The plots show
the variations in pola.
- The top plot shows the total power time series. It has been
smoothed to 10 milliseconds. The black plot is polA while the
blue plot is polB. The y axis units are Tsys. You can see that
polA is jumping around a lot more than polb.
- The bottom plot is the magnitude of the spectrum of the time
series (over the entire 90 seconds). The first 20 hz of the
spectrum is plotted. The dashed green lines are placed every 1.2
hz. The spectrum has power at harmonics of this frequency.
The 1.2 hz power is probably coming from the
refrigerator for the dewar. Somehow it is modulating the gain at
this period. This is probably the culprit for the jumps in Tsys in
polA.
note: When the dewar was brought down to the lab, one of the
cables in the dewar had lost its insulation and was
intermitantly shorting out. It may have been that the
vibration of the refrigerator caused the cable to short.
processing: x101/040924/doit.pro
May03 to Mar04
fit GAIN CURVES to calib data. (top)
link
to
gain curve plot
Gain curves were fit to the cband gain data
from 05may03 through 29feb04. On 05may03 new cals were
installed and the cal cable was tightened. This data is described
below.The plots
show
the gain data (black) and the fits (red) for 4500, 4860,
5000, 5400,5690, and 5900 Mhz. These gain equations were installed
on 08mar04.
- Fig 1 shows the az,za distribution for the data. The fit used
a 3rd order polynomial in (za-10) and 1az, 2az, and 3az sin, cos
terms.
- Fig 2,3 plots the gain data and the fit to za. The fit
equation is plotted with the sigma for the fit (in K/Jy). T
- Fig 4,5 plots the fit residuals (data-fit) vs za.
The only puzzling thing is that the gainfits for 4500Mhz and 4860
Mhz are almost identical..
The routine gainget() or corhgainget() will
now return the cband gain for data after 05may03 from these
equations. The coefficients can be found in the ascii file
data/gain.datR9 (this is provided in the AO
idl
distribution for correlator routines). You can also find a
copy of it at AO in /home/phil/idl/data/gain.datR9.
processing: x101/cb/may03/dogainfit.pro
may03 thru feb04
: System performance data used to compute gain curves. (top)
Heiles calibration scans done from 05may03
(after the cals installed) thru 29feb04 were used to measure
the system performance. This data was then used to compute the
gain curves used after 05may03.
The first set of plots show the system
performance
with all frequencies overplotted. The sources are identified
by symbol and the frequencies by color.
Fig 1 shows the distributions on the dish of the measurements.
Fig 2 has the Gain in Kelvins/Jansky. This relies on the cals
and the source flux. Ths next plot is Tsys vs za in
Kelvins followed by the SEFD (System Equivalent Flux
density) in Janskies / Tsys. At the bottom is the average beam
width in arc seconds.
Fig 3 plots the coma parameter, first sidelobe height below
the peak, the main beam efficiency, followed by the main beam +
1st sidelobe beam efficiency.
Fig 3 has the pointing errors in az,za, and total (added in
quadrature) for the data.
The second set of plots has the
data plotted separately for each frequency. The colors and
symbols are used to differentiate the sources. The figures are:
Fig 1 4500 Mhz Gain,Tsys . 275 points
Fig 2 4500 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 3 4860 Mhz Gain,Tsys 275 points.
Fig 4 4860 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies.
Fig 5 5000 Mhz Gain,Tsys 567 points.
Fig 6 5000 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 7 5400 Mhz Gain,Tsys 566 points.
Fig 8 5400 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 9 5690 Mhz Gain,Tsys 292 points.
Fig 10 5690 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 11 5900 Mhz Gain,Tsys 292 points.
Fig 12 5900 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Use the second set of plots to identify the
sources.
processing: x101/cb/may03/doit.pro
Aug02 to
Dec02 fit GAIN CURVES to calib data. (top)
link
to
gain curve plot
Gain curves were fit to the cband gain data
from 28aug02 (after horn focus change) to 30nov02. This data is
described below.The plots
show
the gain data (black) and the fits (red) for 4500, 4860,
5000, and 5400 Mhz.
- Fig 1 shows the az,za distribution for the data. The fit used
a 3rd order polynomial in (za-10) and 1az, 2az, and 3az sin, cos
terms.
- Fig 2 plots the gain data and the fit to za. The fit
equation is plotted with the sigma for the fit (in K/Jy). T
- Fig 3 plots the fit residuals (data-fit) vs za.
The routine gainget() or corhgainget() will now
return the cband gain for data after 28aug02 from these equations.
The coefficients can be found in the ascii file
data/gain.datR9 (this is provided in the AO
idl
distribution for correlator routines). You can also find a
copy of it at AO in /home/phil/idl/data/gain.datR9.
processing: x101/cb/dec02/dogainfit.pro
aug02-dec02:
System performance:Gain,Tsys,Sefd... using calibration runs.
(top)
Heiles calibration scans done from 28aug02
(after the horn focus) were used to show the system performance
after the horn focus.
The first set of plots show the system
performance
with all frequencies overplotted. The sources are identified
by symbol and the frequencies by color.
Fig 1 shows the distributions on the dish of the measurements.
Fig 2 has the Gain in Kelvins/Jansky. This relies on the cals
and the source flux. Ths next plot is Tsys vs za in
Kelvins followed by the SEFD (System Equivalent Flux
density) in Janskies / Tsys. At the bottom is the average beam
width in arc seconds.
Fig 3 plots the coma parameter, first sidelobe height below
the peak, the main beam efficiency, followed by the main beam +
1st sidelobe beam efficiency.
Fig 3 has the pointing errors in az,za, and total (added in
quadrature) for the data.
The second set of plots has the
data plotted separately for each frequency. The colors and
symbols are used to differentiate the sources. The figures are:
Fig 1 4500 Mhz Gain,Tsys 241points.
Fig 2 4500 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 3 4860 Mhz Gain,Tsys 245 points.
Fig 4 4860 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies.
Fig 5 5000 Mhz Gain,Tsys 279 points.
Fig 6 5000 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 7 5400 Mhz Gain,Tsys 273 points.
Fig 8 5400 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 9 5690 Mhz Gain,Tsys 35 points.
Fig 10 5690 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 11 5900 Mhz Gain,Tsys 35 points.
Fig 12 5900 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Use the second set of plots to identify the
sources.
processing: x101/cb/dec02/doit.pro
28aug02 horn moved down
1.08" to put phase center at focus. (top)
link to
new plot: system performance before and after the horn move.
The cband horn was lowered 1.08" toward the
tertiary to place the phase center at the focus (this is explained
on the lband
focus
change page). The source J0738+177 was tracked on 26aug02
before the horn was moved and then again on 28aug02 after the horn
positioning. The plots
show the results of the focus change.
- Fig 1 shows the gain (K/Jy) before (black) and after (red).
The absolute gain values depends on the source flux and the cal.
The relative change does not rely on these values. The lower
plot shows the relative change in gain (after-before)/before.
- Fig 2 has the gain, Tsys, Sefd, and average beam width for
before and after.
- Fig 3 plots the coma, 1st sidelobe level, main beam
efficiency, and mainbeam +1st sidelobe efficiency.
- Fig 4 is the pointing error for this source before and after.
- Fig 5 plots the change in pointing error before and after.
Above 8 degrees za the gain improved. Below 6
degrees it degraded. The za pointing error for the source setting is
up to 25 asecs. The change in pointing because of the move was up to
10 asecs for rising azimuth.
The focus
curves
done by moving the platform (bottom plot. cband is
bright red color) show that the cband horn was in focus (platform
height=1256.35 feet) at za=5 degrees. Below za=5 the platform
focused higher (the ray path is too short) while for za > 5 the
platform was focusing below 1256.35 (the ray path is too long).
Making the ray path shorter by 1 " should have hurt the gain below
za=5 and helped it above za=5.
The model
of
the focus height using AO9 as the reference agrees with the
platform focus curves and the data we took here. The model
of
the focus height with the reflector at the origin (about 2"
difference in focus) does not.
sep01 to 27aug02
fit GAIN CURVES to calib data. (top)
link
to
gain curve plot
Gain curves were fit to the cband gain data
from 01sep01 (after dish adjusted) to 27aug02 (before horn focus
changed). This data is described below.The plots
show
the gain data (black) and the fits (red) for 4500, 4860,
5000, and 5400 Mhz.
- Fig 1 shows the az,za distribution for the data. Because of
the incomplete az coverage, the fit was only done to za.
- Fig 2 plots the gain data and the fit to za. The fit
equation is plotted with the sigma for the fit (in K/Jy). The
quadratic and cubic terms of the fit should only be used for za
>= 14 degrees.
- Fig 3 plots the fit residuals (data-fit) vs za.
The routine gainget() or corhgainget() will now
return the cband gain for data after 01sep01. The coefficients can
be found in the ascii file data/gain.datR9 (this is provided
in the AO
idl
distribution for correlator routines). You can also find a
copy of it at AO in /home/phil/idl/data/gain.datR9.
processing: x101/cb/aug02/dogainfit.pro
sep01-aug02: System
performance:Gain,Tsys,Sefd... using calibration runs. (top)
All of the heiles calibration scans sept01 to
aug02 for the cband receiver were used to plot the system
performance. This includes dedicated calibration runs and individual
calibration scans done by observers. Scans with pointing errors
greater than 30 Asecs, extended sources, tsys greater than 46K, or
uncertain flux at 5 Ghz were not used. This data was taken under
differing weather conditions. After the above selection, there were
1697 points (all frequencies) and 30 different sources.
The first set of plots show the system
performance with all frequencies overplotted. The sources are
identified by symbol and the frequencies by color.
Fig 1 has the Gain in Kelvins/Jansky. This relies on the cals
and the source flux. Ths next plot is Tsys vs za in
Kelvins followed by the SEFD (System Equivalent Flux
density) in Janskies / Tsys. At the bottom is the average beam
width in arc seconds.
Fig 2 plots the coma parameter, first sidelobe height below
the peak, the main beam efficiency, followed by the main beam +
1st sidelobe beam efficiency.
Fig 3 has the pointing errors in az,za, and total (added in
quadrature) for the data.
The second set of plots has the
data plotted separately for each frequency. The colors and
symbols are used to differentiate the sources. The figures are:
Fig 1 4500 Mhz Gain,Tsys 355 points.
Fig 2 4500 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 3 4860 Mhz Gain,Tsys 353 points.
Fig 4 4860 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies.
Fig 5 5000 Mhz Gain,Tsys 427 points.
Fig 6 5000 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 7 5400 Mhz Gain,Tsys 420 points.
Fig 8 5400 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 9 5600 Mhz Gain,Tsys 71 points.
Fig 10 5600 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Fig 11 5900 Mhz Gain,Tsys 71 points.
Fig 12 5900 Mhz sidelobes,beam efficiencies
Use the second set of plots to identify the
sources.
processing: x101/cb/aug02/doit.pro
22dec01: sefd, pointing
errors. (top)
A calibration run was done on 22dec01 using the
heiles scans. The plots show
the sefd and pointing errors. A more detailed analysis of this
data is included in the sep01 to aug02
system performance.
home_~phil