Intro
The receiver temperature (flange temperature)
was initially measured for the cooled qrfh system at the antenna
test building on:
- 25jan23 2 to 14 GHz with the fieldfox preamp off. polX and
polY were measured
- 31jan23 4 to 14 GHz with the fieldfox preamp on. PolY was
measured. We looked vertical and 30 deg to the north.
Some modifications were then made to the
dewar (cal sma cables replaced with stainless steel cable).
The dewar was then remeasured on 31mar31 at the antenna test
range.
This page shows the 31mar31 measurements as
well as a comparison with the earlier measurements.
- 2-14 GHz field fox preamp off
- 10-14 ghz field fox preamp on
- We tried 2-14 GHz preamp on, but the rfi around 2.5GHz
caused overloads in the field fox.
Setup
- cooled qrfh receiver placed on lift in the antenna test
building and then lifted to the roof.
- T16k was around 18K during the measurements
- The sky was used for the cold load.
- We started at 7:42am and finished around 8:27 (on the
sky)
- There were no clouds i the sky
- the sun elevation went from 19 (at 7:47) to 28deg at
8:27
- Absorber was used for the hot load.
- It was suspended about a cm above the dewar
- The temperature was measured at the center of the
absorber before the first measurements and after the last
measurement (8:27 start, 8:46 end)
- The temp went from 76F to 77.6F
- A warm postamp was used at the output of the dewar
(26db?).
- The sma cable was about 3 feet. The jan23
measurements had an 8" sma cable.
- The field fox spectrum analyses was used to measure the
signal:
- 2 to 14 GHz,bw 1MHz, 10001 points, attn 0, preamp off,
rms detector.
- avg 10 sweeps trace 1, pkhold trace 2
- loop 10 times giving 10 avg spectra/measurement
- This took about 70 secs / spectra or 12 minutes
measurement
- Since the field fox has only one input, we had to do 1 pol
at a time
- the sequence was:
- Pol Y(file labeled a)
- Pol X(file labeled b)
- Preamp off sky,abs was done for both pols
- preamp on sky,abs was done for just pola (ypol)
since that was what we did in jan23.
- Pre amp off 2-14 ghz sky
- On sky. files: trcv_skyb_nnnnn.dat (nnnnn 0 to 9)
- On sky files: trcv_skya_nnnnn.dat
- Pre amp on 2-10 ghz sky
- On sky. files: trcv_pa_skya_nnnnn.dat (nnnnn 0 to 9)
- On sky files: trcv_pa_skyb_nnnnn.dat
- On abs
- 2-14 ghz preamp off: trcv_absa_nnnnn.dat
- 4-14 ghz preamp on: trcv_absa_pa_nnnnn.dat
- 2-14 ghz preamp off:trcv_absb_nnnnn.dat
- the file format is:
- 10001 points/register (2 registers: avg, pkhold)
- 32bit floats
- data
- freq[i],r1[i],r2[i], freq[i+1],r1[i+1],r2[i+].. ind 0
to 10001-1
- files are located at /share/phildat/wbrcv/230125/
- The datataking program, config file:
- /share/megs/phil/x101/230331/ffdo.. program
- config files:
- cmd_230331_nopreamp.dat
- cmd_230331_preamp.dat
- I edited the cmd_..dat before each measurement to update
the file prefix.
Processing:
There were 2 sets of measurements.. 2-14
then 4 to 14 GHz
- cold spectra on sky, hot spectra on absorber.
- Note:
- we did not try tilting the rcvr north to get away from
the 12-13GHz rfi
- in jan23 the green lines had the rcvr tilted north.
For each set:
- input the 10 hot and 10 cold spectra
- convert each spectra to linear
- compute rms/mean for the 10 hot, 10 cold spectra (to
check for rfi)
- avg to 10 hot, 10 cold spectra
- compute the Yfactor : avgHotSpc/avgColdSpc (use the
reg with avg sweeps).
- compute Tflange (Trcv)
- Tflange=(Tabs - Tsky*Yfactor)/(Yfactor-1)
- For Tabs we used a single value for entire freq
range(see above)
- for Tsky we used interpolated values from Paul
goldsmiths paper on Tsky vs freq
- No scattered radiation was included in the computation..
Plotting the results:
2-14 GHz fieldfox preamp off
The plots show the results of the
postamp off measurements (.ps) (.pdf)
- Page 1: signal levels polY (polX gain was higher)
- top:
- Black on absorber
- red: on sky
- blue: noise floor of field fox spectrum analyzer
- bottom: Signal level above the Noise floor of
spectrum analzyer.
- Black: absorber. worst case 5db at 14GHz
- red: sky. worst case 1db at 14 GHz
- The sky measurement will be impacted by the field fox
noise floor.
- Page 2: Power on hot load, cold load, and yfactor
- each color is a different measurement:
- Top: power vs freq on Absorber
- vertical scale is linear in Power
- Middle: power vs freq on sky
- lots more rfi here. vertical scale blownup x10
compared to top frame.
- there is a bump between 11 and 13 GHz . about 60%
increase in power onsky.
- This is not seen on abs (power level too high
or not present?).
- Bottom: Yfactor:PowerAbs/ PowerSky
- The ratio is 7-8 db until around 9GHz where it starts
to fall.
- the dips,spikes are from rfi.
- The two polY measurements were separated by about 2
hours.
- the power levels remained nearly constant (not drift
in gain).
- Looks like the lna gain in polX is higher than
polY (factor of 2 at 2ghz down to close to 1
at 14GHz)
- Page 3: Same plots as page 1, but use the peak hold
spectra
- this shows a little more rfi in the onsky spectra.
- Page 4: rms/mean by freq channel showing rfi
- the rms/mean was computed for the spectra of each freq
channel and then plotted.
- top: on absorber
- bottom: on sky
- rfi tends to be variable so these plots will show rfi.
- the area around the 11 to 13 GHz bump does not show any
variation.
- Page 5:Receiver (flange) temperature.
- Top: Tsky vs freq (taken from paul goldsmith's plots ..
see above).
- Middle: receiver temperature
- the blues line was the project spec of <30K
from 2 to 14GHz.
- it meets the spec up to 10 GHz for polX, polY is
higher than this level
- These temps are high because we didn't have enough
gain in front of the fieldfox.
- the dewar, amps were the same.
- It must have been the change from 8" to 36" sma
cable between the dewar output and the postamp.
- The vertical purple lines show where the bump was seen
on the sky power
- Bottom: on sky power
- replot the on sky power to show the bump 11 to 13 GHz.
- Page 6: Blowup of Trcv 11 to 13 GHz.
- Black is polY on sky
- red ,polA on sky
- these are much higher than the jan23 measurements
because the input signal was close to the fieldfox noise
floor on sky.
- the light blue lines
- 12.7 - 12.2 GHz. FSS: fixed satellite service space to
earch
- dark blue
- 12.2 to 12.7 : DBS: direct broadcast satellite (space
to earth)
processing:x101/230331/wbtrcv_31mar23_nopa.pro
Pol Y field fox preamp on.
We redid the measurements with polY with the
field fox preamp on. This was to compare what we had measured in
jan23.
The plots show the results of the
31jan23 measurements (.ps) (.pdf)
The field fox setup was similar to the preamp off, except the
span was 4 to 14 GHz.
- Page 1: spectra, noise floor ratio in dbm
- top : Average spectra in dbm
- black: on absorber
- red: on sky
- blue: field fox noise floor with 50 ohm load (preamp
on)
- Bottom: Ratio Spectra to field fox noise floor
- black: absorber
- red: sky vertical
- all values are at least 13db above the noise floor.
- Page 2: average powers with linear plots
- top: on absorber
- middle: on sky
- Bottom: Ratio hot(abs)/cold(sky)
- Page 3: rms/channel for the 10 spectra of each
measurement
- Top: on absorber
- bottom: on sky
- Page 4: Flange temperature
- Top: Tsky used (4 to 14 GHz)
- middle: Tflange
- Red: PolY looking vertical
- the blue line is the 30K spec for the receiver.
- bottom: replot the on sky measurements to compare the
bump around 12 GHz.
- Page 5: blowup 11 to 13 GHz Tflange
- Page 6: compare the 31mar23 (nopreamp) Tflange with the
(preampon) Tflange.
- Top: plot 4 to 14 GHz
- smooth to 31 MHz
- black: polY no preamp.
- red: polY preamp on.
- Trcv is below 30K for the band (excluding the rfi
regions).
- Bottom: blowup 11 to 13 GHz
- 11.7 to 12.2 GHz (fss band)
Processing: x101/230331/wbtrcv_31mar23_pa.pro
Compare Tflange before, after dewar
changes.
The flange temperature before (jan23) and
after (mar23) the dewar modifications to see if anything had
changed.
the plots show the tflange comparison
(.ps) (.pdf)
- Page 1: power levels at input to the field fox
- Black: sky,absorber jan23
- red: sky,absorber mar23
- blue: field fox noise floor.
- top: 2-14 GHz no preamp
- bottom: 4-14 GHz with preamp on.
- The black (jan23) lines are 3 to 4 db higher than the
31mar23 lines
- This is either a postamp difference (felix says no) or
the change from 8" to 36" for the line from dewar to
postamp.
- Page 2: Flange temperature before and after dewar
changes.
- Black: jan23 flange temps (before changes)
- Read: mar23 flange temps (after changes)
- Top: 2-14 GHz field fox preamp off
- the jan23 temp is much lower than the mar23.
- This is mainly from the power level into the field
fox was too low during mar23.
- Bottom: 4-14 GHz field fox preamp on
- above 7.5 GHz the values are identical
- below 7.5 GHz, the differences are probably rfi
changes..
processing: x101/230331/wbtrcv_cmp_jan_mar.pro
Summary:
- The flange temperature for the 12meter wide band rcvr was
measured at the antenna test shack on 31mar23 after the
changes were made to the dewar.
- hot,cold load measurements were done: 2-14 GHz with
the field fox preamp off
- the measured Tflange was higher than that measured in
jan23.
- The higher Tflange was caused by the lower power
level going into the field fox.
- switching the dewar to postamp cable from 8" to
36" was the major config change.
- hot,cold load measurement were also done 4-14 GHz with the
field fox preamp on (polY only)
- The Tflange was identical to that measured prior to the
changes.