Lbw cal values measured 08dec08
26dec08
Links to PLOTS:
hcorcal:
Fits
to the Average CalDeflection/Tsys (.ps) (.pdf):
Hcorcal
in kelvins (.ps) (.pdf).
diagnostics:
CalDeflection/Tsys
for the individual passes (.ps) (.pdf).
Fits
to the CalDeflection/Tsys for the individual passes (.ps) (.pdf).
othercals
The
average calValues in kelvins and the fits (.ps) (.pdf):
Over
plotting all of the cals (in deg K) (.ps) (.pdf).
diagnostics:
CalDeflectionCalX/calDeflectionHcorcal
for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf)
Fits
to the CalDeflX/calHcorcalDefl for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
Over
plotting the new and old cal values (.ps) (.pdf).
Comparing
Tsys measurements using 26sep08 cals and the 08dec08 cals (.ps) (.pdf):
Links to SECTIONS:
Why the cals were remeasured.
Measuring the high correlated cal using
blank sky and absorber
Measuring the other cals on blank sky
relative to the high correlated cal.
Why the cals were
remeasured.
The lbw cal values were measured on 26sep08.
- The cal values measured gave a system temperature with polA about
8 kelvins higher than polB.
- The cal values for polA and B (hcorcal) were very close.
- In the past there had been a 2 Kelvin difference between
polA and polB cals for hcorcal.
- If the linear circular switch remained in circular while the data
was taken, then this could explain the values of the cals being the
same. The header values for the file said that we were using
linears (the correct setting).
To check this discrepancy, the cals were remeasured on 08dec08.
Measuring the high
correlated
cal using sky and absorber: (top)
The high correlated cal value (diode 1 going
to
polA and polB) for lband wide was measured on 08dec08 using
the sky/absorber
technique.
The sky observations tracked blank sky starting at 15:15 . The sky was
clear and the faa 1330,1350, remy 1290, and punta salinas radars were
running. The faa radar blanking was used. The
absorber measurement was done around 15:40. In both cases
(sky and
absorber) the lbw filter bank was used.
The temperatures used in the computation were:
Tabsorber |
299 K |
Tsky |
5 K |
Treceiver |
from test shack feb03 |
Tscattered |
15 K |
The band 1120 to 1720 MHz was covered 9 times on
absorber and 9 times on sky. The ratio (CalOn-CalOff)/CallOff was then
computed for the data. Each spectra of 600 MHz (6144 points) was then
fit
to an 8th order harmonic and 1st order polynomial (the order was chosen
to include the ripples in the caldefl/Tsys spectra). The fit was
iterated
throwing out points whose residuals were greater than 3 sigma .
Whenever
a point was excluded, 5 points adjacent to the fit were also excluded .
A robust average of the passes
was
computed (iterating and throwing out outliers). There was some jumps in
some of the passes. These were not included in the average. The passes
used to compute the average were:
- polA: passes [1,4,5,7,8] counting from 0
- polB: passes [0,2,3,5,6] counting from 0
The average spectra was
then fit with the same function. See reducing
the cal data for more info on the reduction.
The results of the reduction are:
- Fits
to the Average CalDeflection/Tsys (.ps) (.pdf):
This shows the average Tcal/Tsys data with the fits over plotted in
red.
The top two plots are on the absorber (polA,polB) while the
bottom
two plots are on the sky. The averages were made from the 5
selected
passes
through the frequency band. The units are Tsys (about 30K for sky
and 300 K for absorber). The fitRms is computed for the fraction of the
spectra used in fitting. The rms and fraction of spectrum used are
printed
on each plot. The radiometer equation should give:
rms=sqrt(2ratio)./sqrt(25e6bw/256chan*3secs*9loops*2hanning)=.0006
The absorber fits match this. The sky fits are about 6 time larger.
This
is because the fits are not fitting the 1 MHz standing wave from the
dish.
This is ok since that ripple should not be in the cal value anyway.
- The Hcorcal
in kelvins (.ps) (.pdf).
- The first two plots show the cal fits in kelvins measured from
the Sky,
absorber, and the sky, absorber ratio (Y factor). The top plot is polA,
the middle plot is polB. The dashed line is the receiver temperature
used
for calSky.
- The calAbs and calY agree while the calSky is
different. The calsky Dc level can be shifted up or down by changing
the amount of Tscattered.
- The Trcvr curve will have the largest affect on Calsky.
- The bottom plot is the cal In kelvins from the Y factor. The *
are
spaced
every 10 MHz. PolA is black and polB is red. These are the values that
will be used for the cal.
Diagnostics:
The first set of plots show the calOn-caloff/caloff
for each pass through the data. The second set over plots the fits to
each
pass to see how stable the system is.
- CalDeflection/Tsys
for the 9 passes thru the frequency band (.ps) (.pdf).
- The first page shows on absorber for the 9 passes
through the
receiver
band.
- The top plot is polA while the bottom plot is polB. The
spectra
have
been offset for plotting purposes. The units are Tsys (on absorber it
is
about 300K). The dashed vertical line shows the start of each 100 MHz
integration
(4sbc*25MHz each).
- Some of the 1200 to 1300 Mhz rfi is getting in while on
absorber.
- Some of the passes have jumps 100 Mhz wide.
- The integrations are done in 100 Mhz chunks.
- After 100 Mhz we reconfigure (mainly the filter bank and
the synthesizer) to move to the next 100 Mhz.
- The jumps mean that the cal is changing or Tsys is changing
(probably Tsys).
- The worse jumps are 1320-1420 PolB.
- The filter sequence used near this band is:
- 1220-1320 filter 5 1100 to 1800
- 1320-1420 filter 3 1230 to 1470
- 1420-1520 filter 5 1100 to 1800..
- So maybe the 1230 to 1470 filter switch is not always
closing well.
- The second page shows on the sky for the 9 passes
through
the receiver band. The top plot is polA while the bottom plot is polB.
The spectra have been offset for plotting purposes. The units are Tsys
(about 30K on the sky). The dashed lines show the 100 MHz boundaries
(that
were taken separately). The birdie around 1240/1260 are the punta
salinas radar. The below 1400 MHz looks like our old resonance ?
- Fits
to the CalDeflection/Tsys for the 9 passes thru the frequency band (.ps)
(.pdf).
This over plots the fits to each pass (6144 points covering the
600
MHz.). The absorber fits vary by more than the Sky fits since deltaTsys
is a larger fraction of the cal when you are on absorber. This includes
the fits that were not used in the average.
processing:
x101/lb/cals/dec08/hcorcal/lbwinp.pro,lbwfit.pro,lbwcmp.pro,lbwplot.pro
Measuring the other
cals using sky and the high correlated cal (top)
The high correlated cal was measured (see above)
using
sky and absorber as the hot and cold load. The other cals were then
measured
relative to the high correlated cal on 08dec08 starting around 16:00.
Blank
sky was tracked, the filter bank was used, the radar blanker was used,
and the following cal sequence was run:
- hcorcal(on,off)
- hcal(on,off),hxcal(on,off),h90cal(on,off)
- hcorcal(on,off)
- lcorcal(on,off),lcal(on,off),lxcal(on,off),l90cal(on,off)
- hcorcal(on,off)
100 MHz at a time was measured (4 by 25MHz) going
from
1120 to 1720 MHz. The cal was cycled on/off for 3 secs at each
step.
The entire frequency range was repeated 6 times.
The ratio (calOnX-calOffX)/caloffX was computed
(X is the other cals) and then it was divided by
(calOnHcor-calOffHcor)/calOffHcor).
A spectrum for the entire pass was then constructed of the other cals
relative
to the hcorcal. The spectral fits for the 6 passes were averaged. The
average
spectra was multiplied by the hcorCal value in kelvins (this
removed
the hcorCal shape). The resulting spectra was fit with an 8th order
harmonic
and 1st order polynomial. For more info see
computing the cal value.
The results of the reduction are:
- The
average calValues in kelvins and the fits (.ps) (.pdf):
The fits to the 6 passes have been averaged together and then
multiplied
by the hcorcal fit (in kelvins). There are 14 plots. 7 cals each with
polA
and polB. The red lines are the fits to the data. The fit rms's are
better
than 1.5% over the full band. Some of the passes with jumps in them
were not used in the average.
- Over
plotting all of the cals (in deg K) (.ps) (.pdf).
The top plot is the high cals and the bottom plot is the low cals. The
solid lines are polA while the dashed lines are polB. There are two
sets
of lines that follow each other. That is because the same diode always
feeds two types of cals (e.g. diode1 goes to polA for hcorcal and for
huncorcal).
Diagnostics:
- CalDeflectionCalX/calDeflectionHcorcal
for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
There is 1 page for each calType (7 pages). The top plot is polA and
the
bottom plot is polB. The 6 passes through the freq range are over
plotted
with an offset. The units for the y axis are TcalHcorcal since each of
the cal deflections have been divided by the hcorcal deflection. Some
of the passes with jumps in them were not used in the average.
- Fits
to the CalDeflX/calHcorcalDefl for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
This over plots the fits to each pass (6144 points covering the
600
MHz.).
- Over
plotting the new and old cal values (.ps) (.pdf).
The solid lines are the new cals. The dash lines are the old cal
values.
The plots are:
- Top HiCalsPolA: black Diode1 -> polA, Red diode2->polA.
- 2nd HiCalsPolB: black Diode1->polB, Red diode2->polB
- 3rd LoCalsPolA: black Diode1 -> polA, Red diode2->polA.
- 4th LoCalsPolB: black Diode1->polB, Red diode2->polB
- Comparing Tsys
measurements using 26sep08 cals and the 08dec08 cals (.ps) (.pdf):
- The top plot is Tsys measured using the 26sep08. The higher set
of points is polA. The lower is polb.
- The bottom plot is Tsys measured using the 08dec08 cal values.
TsysA and tsysB are now much closer. There is still a difference of
1-2K in the Tsys. This may have to do with the resonance at 1400 Mhz in
Pola.
PolA cal is not about 2K lower than polB. the 26sep08
measurement had them nearly equal which gave a large polA Tsys.
processing:
x101/lb/cals/dec08/othercals/lbwinp.pro,lbwcmp.pro,lbwfit.pro,lbwplot.pro
home_~phil