47 receiver calibration.
The 47 Mhz receiver uses a set of dipoles that
are mounted around the carriage 430 Mhz line feed. The system was
originally
built to be used with the 47 Mhz when studying meteors.
Facts:
-
The First LO is a fixed synthesizer upstairs which is normally
set to 76.8
Mhz (46.8 + 30). When using the system you need to make sure
that the synthesizer
is on and set to the correct frequency (verify this with the
birdie maker).
-
The IF comes out at 30 Mhz in the receiver room on the rightmost
rack of
the 30 Mhz racks. You need to switch the IF selector to 47A, 47B
manually.
-
If you cable up left to left, left to top, base band mix, and
then plug
into the Ri you will get the real signal in
the Q digitizer
(rightmost of pair), imaginary in I (leftmost). If you use
riget
with the complex option and then compute the spectrum, the
frequency will
be flipped. When looking at 30 Mhz on the spectrum analyzer the
spectrum
is flipped.
Sections:
history
calibration measurements
miscellaneous
History:
-
20jan06: Receiver is off frequency by about 150 hz. About
01feb06 found
that the 5 Mhz reference was not working. It has now been fixed
(01feb06).
Calibration
measurements:
03jun14: on,off the crab nebula, gain, beamwidth.
20jan06: On, off 3C348.0 (Hercules A)
Tsys,gain,Beamwidth,sefd
Miscellaneous
20jan06: A first look at the 47 Mhz
bandpass,
dynamic spectra, rfi.
03jun14: on/off the crab nebula
On 03jun14 the crab nebula was tracked with the
47mhz receiver.
The setup was:
- Use the line feed model for tracking
- track the source, then move off by about 2 degrees, then move
back on source.
- Use 1 Mhz bandwidth about 46.8 Mhz
- sample the voltages with the radar Interface at 1 Mhz, i,q 8
bit sampling
Processing the data
- input the voltages, compute power and then median filter
blocks of 1e6 .. this gave 1 second resolution.
The plots show the total
power vs time and offsets (.ps) (.pdf)
- page 1: source deflection vs time
- top: offset (in degrees) from crab nebula vs time. The
dashed green line shows when we were on source.
- middle: total power vs time.
- red is pola, black is polB
- The total power was computed for each 1 usec sampled and
then median filters to 1 second resolution.
- You can see that polA (red) was wandering around
- Bottom: polB Temperature vs time
- With chris salters help we got:
- flux crab (The absolute spectrum of cas A. barrs,genzel,
et al
- 26.3 Mhz, 2990 Jy
- 81.5 Mhz 1880 Jy
- 46.8 Mhz 2360 Jy (using the spectral index from the
above two).
- Tsys off crab: 9000K (408 Mhz survey et al +
salter, and spectral index of 2.4?)
- The gain was then 2.6 K/ Jy
- I didn't bother with polA
- Page 2: source deflection vs offset
- The source deflection vs position offset is plotted
- the horizontal dashed green line is at 1/2 the average
source strength
- the fwhm (dashed red lines) varied from .97 to 1.4 Degrees
Summary:
- Pol A looks like it has some stability problems
- I've assumed that the receiver temperature is 0.
- PolB gain : 2.6 K/Jy
- fwhm beamwidth 1 to 1.4 degrees
- The baseline is difficult to measure since the crab sits in
the galaxy anti center.
processing:
x101/140603/bmwid47mhz.pro
20jan06: On, off 3C348.0
(Hercules A) Tsys,gain,Beamwidth,sefd2: (top)
On 20jan06 the telescope moved on and off 3C348.0 (Hercules
A B1950: ra/dec 16:48:40.4/05:03:48) while taking data with
the 47
Mhz receiver. A 1 Mhz band centered at 46.8 Mhz was base band
sampled in
both polarizations.
The sequence for data taking was:
-
Source rising, move off source by -2 degrees in za.
Tracking 2 degrees
off, fire the cal for 14 seconds.
-
Move on source and sit for awhile
-
From -2 deg za offset drive to +4 deg za Offset (passing through
the source)
at slew rate (.04 deg/sec).
-
Move from +4 deg za offset to -4 deg za offset passing through
the source
at slew rate.
-
Fire the cal while off source.
The data processing was:
-
input the data, compute power and median filter to 16
milliseconds.
-
Interpolate the telescope 1 second az, za positions to the
center
of each 16 millisecond sample.
-
Compute the az, za positions for the source at the time
stamp of
each data sample.
-
Compute the Telescope Za - srcZa for each data sample. This is
the source
offset since we only offset in the za direction.
-
For plotting purpose median filter the total power to .5
seconds.
-
Compute scale factor of power counts to Kelvins using the two
cals (at
the start end end of the run). The scale factors agreed to
better than
1% (taken at the beginning and end of run).
-
Fit a gaussian to the power versus zenith angle offset to get
Tsys, srcDeflection,
and beam width.
The plots show the total
power
as we moved across the source (.ps) (.pdf)
:
-
Fig 1 top,middle: The total power vs time for the 700
seconds of
data (top is polA, middle is polB). The green dashed line
is the
system temperature. The red dotted lines are where we crossed
the source.
The jumps in power at the start and end are the cal being fired.
The dip
in power at 400 seconds is when we started to spill over and see
the ground
(which is much colder than the sky).
-
Fig 1 bottom: The zenith angle position of the
telescope. The green
* were on source.
-
Fig 2: Plots the power versus za offset for the data
(top polA,
bottom polB). The bumps at +/- 2.5 degrees are the first
sidelobes. The
dip at +4 degrees is the Tsys going down because of the spill
over (Tsys
>> Tground). The green line is the gaussian fit. The
sidelobes and above
+ 2 deg were not used in the fit.
The first move to the peak is about 25% larger
than
the following two passes over the center. I'm not sure why this
happened.
The data should be retaken with cross scans on a source that
transits closer
to 18 degrees dec.
The table summarizes the results:
cal value |
polA |
polB |
Notes |
calValues used (K) |
5700 |
4792 |
from electronics. These are old values. |
Tsys (K) |
6990 |
6486 |
The Tsys from the src fit is higher. This may be a
sidelobe problem. |
beam width (deg) |
2.1 |
2.1 |
Scaling from 430 linefeed gives a beam width of 1.5
degrees.
The 47 dipoles are under illuminating the dish by 25% (the
are probably
also off a little). |
Tsys/Tsrc |
2.5 |
2.8 |
Using Tsys from the src fit |
Flux src (3C348.0) (Jy) |
1332 |
1332 |
Kuehr et al A&A suppl. vol 45, sep 81, 367-430. |
SEFD (Jy) |
3330 |
3729 |
this does not depend on the cal value. |
Gain (K/Jy) |
2.1 |
1.7 |
|
Notes for future cross scans:
-
When redoing with cross scans try not to spill over so the
baseline remains
flatter.
-
To move 4 degrees in za takes about 1.6 minutes at slew rate.
You will
probably want to go a little slower so the telescope can catch
up.
-
The pointing model is that of the line feed. Looks like it might
be a bit
off. The cross scan should tell us that.
processing: x101/060120/tpinp.pro, proc.pro
20jan06: A first look at
the 47 Mhz bandpass,dynamic spectra, rfi.
On 20jan06 20 seconds of base band data was taken
with
the 47 Mhz receiver. A 1 Mhz band centered at 46.8 Mhz was
recorded
in both polarizations. The telescope was sitting at az=185, za=8.834
degrees
while the sky drifted by (in 20 seconds the sky drifted by 4% of a
beam)
.A birdie at 46.92 Mhz was transmitted with the birdie maker while
this
data was taken. The results are:
Average
spectra
and rms noise (.ps) (.pdf):
-
Fig 1 top: Spectra of 4096 channels (244 hz resolution)
were computed
and then averaged to .2 seconds. This gave 95 spectra for the 20
seconds.
The median bandpass was computed, normalized to the median
power,
and then plotted. The birdie at 46.8 Mhz is the Dc offset of the
a/d converters.
The birdie at 46.92 Mhz comes from the birdies maker.
-
Fig 1 middle: This is a blowup of the median bandpass.
The left
half of the band is a lot rattier than the higher frequency
half.
-
Fig 1 bottom: The total power versus time is plotted.
There are
peaks every 5.3 seconds.
-
Fig 2: The rms/Mean was computed fore each channel of
the 95 spectra
and plotted. The bottom plot is a blowup. The expected value is
determined
by the radiometer equation. In this case the value should be
.141. The
bottom plot shows that the noise statistics are what we expect
(with a
small rise as we move toward the edge of the band (probably
coming from
the filters). The largest variability is at 46.689 Mhz.
Dynamic
spectra
of the 20 second PolA (.gif).
Dynamic
spectra
of the 20 second PolB (.gif).
Dynamic spectra were computed for the
20
seconds using .2 second averaged spectra. A robust fit of a 7th
order polynomial
was fit to the median band passes and then used to remove the
bandpass
shape of each spectra. The spectral channels between 46.61 and
46.67 were
averaged and then used to flatten the image. The images was
then
averaged to 2048 channels. You can see :
-
5.3 second rfi at 46.689 Mhz
-
the birdie maker birdie at 46.92
-
A birdie at 47 Mhz with side bands
-
A birdie at 46.66 that wanders around.
A
high resolution (1 Hz) look at some of the birdies (.ps) (.pdf):
The spectra were recomputed with a 1 hz
resolution.
This gave 20 spectra over the 20 seconds.
Fig 1 Top: This is blowup of the 46.92 Mhz birdie
generated by the
birdie maker (15.64*3 Mhz). The birdie is offset from where it
is supposed
to be by 153 Hz. This offset was also seen on the spectrum
analyzer in
the control room. I tested the synthesizer used to send the
frequency to
the birdie maker and it is locked to the station clock. It looks
like the
synthesizer for the 47 Mhz is either unlocked or someone dialed
in the
wrong frequency.
Fig 1 center: A blowup of the birdie at 47.000452 Mhz.
It was not
resolved in the 1 hz channels. The sidelobes are 11.403 Khz from
the center.
Fig 1 bottom: The 5.3 second birdie at 46.689 Mhz. This
has been
averaged to 31 Hz. It is about 8. Khz wide. You can see that it
is wandering
about in frequency by a few Khz during the 5 seconds.
Summary:
-
The noise statistics for the receiver are correct.
-
The receiver's 1st lo is probably unlocked. (note 01feb06.. 5
Mhz reference
was not working. It has now been fixed).
-
There is a birdie with a 5.3 second period near 46.689 Mhz. It
is 8 khz
wide and wanders by a few Khz every period.
-
There is a narrow birdie (< 1 hz) a 47.00452 Mhz with side
bands spaced
11.403 Khz from the center.
-
The low frequency half of the band is a lot noisier than the
upper half.
processing: x101/060120/dospec.pro
home_~phil