Lbw cal values measured 10jun05
13jun05
Links to PLOTS:
hcorcal:
Fits
to the Average CalDeflection/Tsys (.ps) (.pdf):
Hcorcal
in kelvins (.ps) (.pdf).
diagnostics:
CalDeflection/Tsys
for the 9 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
Fits
to the CalDeflection/Tsys for the 9 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
othercals
The
average calValues in kelvins and the fits (.ps) (.pdf):
Over
plotting all of the cals (in deg K) (.ps) (.pdf).
diagnostics:
CalDeflectionCalX/calDeflectionHcorcal
for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf)
Fits
to the CalDeflX/calHcorcalDefl for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
Over
plotting the new and old cal values (.ps) (.pdf).
Links to SECTIONS:
Why the cals were remeasured.
Measuring the high correlated cal using
blank sky and absorber
Measuring the other cals on blank sky
relative to the high correlated cal.
Why the cals were remeasured.
Tsys for polB jumped on 24apr04 (more
info). It then drifted until the first of jun04. This drifting
was in the polB measurement. It did not matter whether diode1 or diode2
was feeding polB. The sefd was measured for polA and polB using an
unpolarized source and they remained constant. So the drift was in the
cal value. It was somewhere after the diodes since both diodes gave the
same result. The drifting slowed down in jun04. We remeasured the
cal values in aug04. A slow drift in Tsys continued into
2005. You can see this in the TsysPola-TsyspolB
plots.
On 16may05 tsys for lbw started jumping (more
info). After some diagnostics it was decided that something was
loose in the lbw dewar. It was warmed up and opened on 01jun05. During
this inspection, the polB cal cable in the dewar was found to have a crack
where it connected at the inside of the dewar. It was then repaired.
Measuring the high correlated
cal using sky and absorber: (top)
The high correlated cal value (diode 1 going to
polA and polB) for lband wide was measured 10jun04 on the telescope
using the sky/absorber
technique. The sky was remeasured on 13jun05 because of rfi on
the 10th. The absorber data came from 10jun05 and the sky data came from
13jun05 was used for the data reduction. The observations used 3
second calon followed by 3 second cal off. For the sky observations, blank
sky was tracked. In both cases (sky and absorber) the faa radar blanker
was used.
The temperatures used in the computation were:
Tabsorber |
300 K |
Tsky |
5 K |
Treceiver |
from test shack feb03 |
Tscattered |
15 K |
The band 1120 to 1720 Mhz was covered 9 times on
absorber and sky. The ratio (CalOn-CalOff)/CallOff was then computed for
the data. Each spectra of 600 Mhz (6144 points) was then fit to an 8th
order harmonic and 1st order polynomial (the order was chosen to include
the ripples in the caldefl/Tsys spectra). The fit was iterated throwing
out points whose residuals were greater than 3 sigma . Whenever a point
was excluded, 5 points adjacent to the fit were also excluded .
After examing the fits, 3 passes in polB (while
on absorber) were excluded because of jumps in the 1320 to 1420 Mhz band.
A robust average of the passes was then computed (iterating and throwing
out outliers). The average spectra was then fit with the same function.
See reducing
the cal data for more info on the reduction.
The results of the reduction are:
-
Fits
to the Average CalDeflection/Tsys (.ps) (.pdf):
This shows the average Tcal/Tsys data with the fits overplotted in red.The
top two plots are on the absorber (polA,polB) while the bottom two
plots are on the sky. PolA has 9 passes and polB had 6 passes
through the receiver band. The units are Tsys (about 30K for sky
and 300 K for absorber). The fitRms is computed for the fraction of the
spectra used in fitting. The rms and fraction of spectrum used are printed
on each plot. The radiometer equation should give:
rms=sqrt(2ratio)./sqrt(25e6bw/256chan*3secs*9loops*2hanning)=.0006
The absorber fits match this. The sky fits are about 10 time largers. This
is because the fits are not fitting the 1 Mhz standing wave from the dish.
This is ok since that ripple should not be in the cal value anyway. You
can also see that the radar 1240/1260 still gets in through even on the
absorber.
-
The Hcorcal
in kelvins (.ps) (.pdf).
-
The first two plots show the cal fits in kelvins measured from the Sky,
absorber, and the sky,absorber (Y factor). The top plot is polA, the middle
plot is polB. The dashed line is the receiver temperature used for calSky.
The calAbs and calY agree while the calSky is not so close.
-
The bottom plot is the cal In kelvins from the Y factor. The * are spaced
every 10 Mhz. PolA is black and polB is red. These are the values that
will be used for the cal.
-
The major ripple has a period of about 85 Mhz. It is visible in both polarization's
(although the level/phase changes a little). It is there on the absorber
and the sky so it is not coming from in front of the horn. If it is a reflection
in a cable, then it would be about 1.2 meters long (assuming index of refraction=1/.68).
Both of these signals are coming from diode 1. The cal measurements using
diode 2 also have a ripple.
Diagnostics:
The first set of plots show the calOn-caloff/caloff
for each pass through the data. The second set over plots the fits to each
pass to see how stable the system is.
-
CalDeflection/Tsys
for the 9 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
-
The first page shows on absorber for the 9 passes through the receiver
band. The top plot is polA while the bottom plot is polB. The spectra have
been offset for plotting purposes. The units are Tsys (on absorber is about
300K). For polB the band between 1320 and 1420 Mhz had some jumps
(in strips 0,1,and 3). These strips were not used in the computations.
-
The second age shows on the sky for the 9 passes through the
receiver band. The top plot is polA while the bottom plot is polB. The
spectra have been offset for plotting purposes. The units are Tsys (about
30K on the sky)
-
Fits
to the CalDeflection/Tsys for the 9 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
This over plots the fits to each pass (6144 points covering the 600
Mhz.). You can see the jumps in the data for polB on absorber. The absorber
fits vary by more than the Sky fits since deltaTsys is a larger fraction
of the cal when you are on absorber.
processing: x101/llb/cals/jun05/hcorcal/lbwinp.pro,lbwfit.pro,lbwcmp.pro,lbwplot.pro
Measuring the other
cals using sky and the high correlated cal (top)
The high correlated cal was measured above using sky
and absorber as the hot and cold load. The other cals were then measured
relative to the high correlated cal. Blank sky was tracked and the following
cal sequence was run:
-
hcorcal(on,off)
-
hcal(on,off),hxcal(on,off),h90cal(on,off)
-
hcorcal(on,off)
-
lcorcal(on,off),lcal(on,off),lxcal(on,off),l90cal(on,off)
-
hcorcal(on,off)
100 Mhz at a time was measured (4 by 25Mhz) going from
1120 to 1720 Mhz. The cal was cycled on/off for 3 secs at each step.
The entire frequency range was repeated 6 times.
The ratio (calOnX-calOffX)/caloffX was computed
(X is the other cals) and then it was divided by (calOnHcor-calOffHcor)/calOffHcor).
A spectrum for the entire pass was then constructed of the other cals relative
to the hcorcal. The spectra for the 6 passes were averaged. The average
spectra was multiplied by the hcorCal value in kelvins (this removed the
hcorCal shape). The resulting spectra was fit with an 8th order harmonic
and 1st order polynomial. For more info see
computing the cal value.
The results of the reduction are:
-
The
average calValues in kelvins and the fits (.ps) (.pdf):
The 6 passes have been averaged together and then multiplied by the hcorcal
fit (in kelvins). There are 14 plots. 7 cals each with polA and polB. The
red lines are the fits to the data. The fit rms's are better than 1% over
the full band. The fits are doing a better job of interpolating across
the rfi than the older method (averaging over the 25 Mhz band)
-
Over
plotting all of the cals (in deg K) (.ps) (.pdf).
The top plot is the high cals and the bottom plot is the low cals. The
solid lines are polA while the dashed lines are polB. There are two sets
of lines that follow each other. That is because the same diode always
feeds two types of cals (e.g. diode1 goes to polA for hcorcal and for huncorcal).
These pairs do not track as well for the low cals. This is probably do
to the low value of the cal (increasing the errors). The ripple is in all
cals but it is strongest in polA.
Diagnostics:
-
CalDeflectionCalX/calDeflectionHcorcal
for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
There is 1 page for each calType (7 pages). The top plot is polA and the
bottom plot is polB. The 6 passes through the freq range are overplotted
with an offset. The units for the y axis are TcalHcorcal since each of
the cal deflections have been divided by the hcorcal deflection.
-
Fits
to the CalDeflX/calHcorcalDefl for the 6 passes (.ps) (.pdf).
This over plots the fits to each pass (6144 points covering the 600
Mhz.).
-
Over
plotting the new and old cal values (.ps) (.pdf).
The solid lines are the new cals. The dash lines are the old cal values.
The plots are:
-
Top HiCalsPolA: black Diode1 -> polA, Red diode2->polA.
-
2nd HiCalsPolB: black Diode1->polB, Red diode2->polB
-
3rd LoCalsPolA: black Diode1 -> polA, Red diode2->polA.
-
4th LoCalsPolB: black Diode1->polB, Red diode2->polB
The old cal value were a 3rd order polynomial fit to the 25 Mhz averages.
Looking at the input spectra of the old data, ripple was present but not
as large as it currently is. polB cal cable was the one repaired.
Diode2 -> polB has a large jump up (since more cal is getting in)
but Diode1 going to polB did not increase as much. That is a bit of a mystery.
processing: x101/lb/cals/jun05/othercals/lbwinp.pro,lbwcmp.pro,lbwfit.pro,lbwplot.pro
home_~phil