Intro
left off here
On 17dec21 the pulsars B0329+54 and B0833-45 (vela)
were observed with the 12meter using the xband receiver. These
are the two strongest known pulsars (vela 1000 mJy, B0329+54
200mJ at lband). Ben detected Vela but did not detect B0329+54
(although detection was expected). I looked at the Tsys during
the observation to see it there was a reason for this.
Setup:
- mock spectrometer used to take the data.
- 7 bands of 172.032 MHz/band recorded
- Cfr of bands:
- 8219.84 8360.96 8502.08 8643.20 8784.32 8925.44 9066.56
MHz.
- bands spaced by 141.2 MHz
- nchan: 128 (1.344 MHz per chan)
- B0329+54
- dump time : 500 usecs
- secsOfdata: 3600
- B0833-45:
- dump time 200 usecs
- secsOfData: 300 secs.
- Prior to each pulsar acquisition, a 60 second hardware
winking cal (25hz) scan was taken.
- It was used to scale the data to cal Units (we have not
yet measured the cal value in deg K).
Standard pulsar processing.
Ben processed both pulsars using the standard psr reduction
routines. He detected vela but did not detect B0329+54.
Ben's notes:
I looked at the Vela and B0329 data that you collected
on Dec 17.
I first processed Vela data and the pulsar can be
clearly seen. I have attached a couple of slides and the
first slide shows some plots of Vela. I first combined the
fits files and then processed using the pulsar ephemeris.
Note that S/N given in the plot is underestimated. I
estimated using the pulse profile and it turns out to be
S/N~18.
Then I processed B0329 data, but unfortunately the
pulsar cannot be seen. I have the same set of plots on the
second slide in the attached pdf. I processed the two
sequences separately as the sequence 00101 has a lot of
stuff after ~16 min (see the bottom-middle plot).
I calculated the expected S/N using the measured flux
densities of the pulsar at low frequencies (fluxes at
Lband and 5 GHz are 203 and 10 mJy, respectively) and a
spectral index of -2 along with the 12 m specs (gain~0.029
K/Jy, Tsys~125 K, BW~1000 MHz). This showed the expected
S/N to be ~16 for 1 hr of integration.
I am not entirely sure why it is not detected. Could
this be due to an pointing issue (but again Vela was
detected)?
The pulsar could be weak at 8.6 GHz, but I feel that
it should be detected!
Looking at the total power vs time
I went back and looked at the total power vs
time for the pulsar data. Was there a reason why B0329+54 was
not detected?
Processing:
For each pulsar:
- Input the 60 second winking cal spectra and compute the
conversion factor from mock counts to cal Units.
- exclude 6% of the band pass on each edge when doing
this.
- This data was taken while on the pulsar.
- input the psr data.
- compute the total power for each band (excluding 6% of the
band on each edge)
- average the total power to 1 second.
- This will give Tsys in mock units (since the psr's are
so weak).
- multiply each band by the cal scale factor.
- This puts the total power (tsys) in cal units.
- We have not yet measured the cal values in deg K (we're
having a hard time trying to place the absorber in front
of the feed).
- The cal is temperature stabilized so we are able
to compare the results from the 2 pulsars.
- For B0329+54 also compute the total power at the full time
resolution (.5 millisecs) for seconds 3000 to 3400 (where
ben's plots looked ugly).
The plots show the results of the processing.
Average
bandpasses of the data (.ps) (.pdf)
- This shows the band pass shapes and overlap.
Plotting
the total power vs time (.ps) (.pdf)
- Page 1: Tsys vs time,freq
- Black is PolA
- Red is PolB
- Top: B0329+54 Tsys vs time
- There is 3600 seconds of data.
- The data have been averaged to 1 second.
- Tsys is in units of the cal value.
- The 7 freq bands for each pol are over plotted.
- The spread for the 7 bands is because the cal value
varies across the 1 GHz of data.
- You see some bumps around 2000 seconds.
- Middle: B0833-45
- There is 300 seconds of data.
- Bottom: TsysRatio: (B0329+54)/(B0833-45) for
each band vs freq.
- The Tsys for vela (B0833-45) is about 3.5% higher than
the Tsys for B0329+54.
- This can be explained by the zenith angle
differences for the observations
- B0329+54: za=40.3 deg
- B0833=34: za=65.0 deg
- Using the fits of tsys vs elevation (more info)
Tsys for za=65 deg should be 4% higher than Tsys at
za=40.3 deg
- So the problem in not detecting B0329+54 is not
because of the average Tsys.
- Page 2: relative change in tsys vs time
- Black is polA, red is polB
- the 7 freq bands are over plotted.
- The 1 second tsys samples have been divided by the
median value for each pol and band
- Top: B0329+54
- there is 3600 seconds of data.
- you can see increases in Tsys (about 1%) that lasted
for about 100 seconds starting at 2000 seconds.
- Pol B Starts trending down after the first jump. PolA
is more stable
- around 3000 seconds you start to see more junk (this
was seen in ben's plots).
- Bottom: B0833-45
- there is 300 seconds of data
- Tsys is relatively stable for this time period
- there is 1 freq band that wanders a bit. This may be
rfi.
- Page 3: hi time res blowup of B0329+54 from 3000 to 3400
seconds.
- Top: 1 second resolution blowup
- You an see downward going glitches that may last for a
few seconds.
- It happens to all 7 freq bands to the rf is probably
getting compressed.
- Middle: blowup 3240 to 3260 seconds at .5 millisecond
resolution.
- You can see the negative going spikes
- Bottom: blowup 3255 to 3258 seconds.
- the dropouts are lasting for 100 to 200 milliseconds.
Summary
- Psr B0329+54 and B0833-45 were observed at xband
- 300 seconds for B0833-45 and 3600 seconds for B0329+54
- B0833-45 was detected
- B0329+54 was not detected.
- The ratio of the average Tsys values for the 2
observations matched what was expected from the 2 zenith
angles.
- B0329+54
- showed positive going tsys bumps of about 1%
starting at 2000 seconds.
- after the first bump, polB tsys started to drift down by
about 1.5%.
- If the positive going bumps were weather related, then
the negative drift may be caused by the match at the amp
input deteriorating.
- Around 3000 seconds into the scan compression dips were
seen in all bands.
- During this observation, the sband rf signal from the
12meter was being passed down the rf fiber with the
xband signal.
- It was probably causing the compression (even with the
20db pad in from of the rf chassis in the pedestal).
- B0833-45 (vela0
- Pol A was relatively stable for the 300 seconds.
- Pol B had a bit more drift.
- one freq band had more drift (rfi?)
- B0833-45 looked a lot more stable with no compressional
dips.. probably because the data only lasted for 5 minutes
(vs 1hour)
- We'll put the 50ohm terminators in the sband rf signal
back in so it won't affect the xb data (until we can
get a new sband filter).
- This should get rid of the compression.