The calon,off, sky , absorber measurements
then measure
CalOn |
CalOff |
|
abs |
Trcv + Tabs*G2*(1-alpha) +Tomt*alpha +
Tcal |
Trcv + Tabs*G2*(1-alpha) +Tomt*alpha |
sky |
Trcv + Tsky*G2*(1-alpha) +Tomt*alpha + Tcal | Trcv + Tsky*G2*(1-alpha) +Tomt*alpha |
The calRatio= (CalOn - CalOff)/CalOff can be
computed for the abs and the sky measurements:
Using (1) (2) you can eliminate Trcv: (I've
shortened calRatioAbs to Rabs, calRatioSky to Rsky).
The parameters needed to compute the cal value are:
When using (1) or (2) to compute Tcal
How big would we expect G2 (1-gamma^2) and alpha
to be?
What I ended up doing was playing with
Trcv, gamma and alpha till i could get the 3 different
measurements of Tcal (3.) (4.) and (5.) to agree.
This was possible since the 3 measurements were affected
differently by gamma and alpha. I really should have just
written a nonlinear fit to get the best values of Trcv, alpha
, and gamma (maybe next time :)
date |
rcvr |
measurement |
measurements installed |
valid
dates |
|
start |
end |
||||
230520 |
wb |
cooled receiver, 4" shims |
230620,230727 |
230620 |
current |
230530 |
wb |
cooled receiver, 2" shims |
230516 |
230520 |
|
220624 |
sb |
switch cal attenuators 3,2 -> 7,7 db |
220628 |
220624 |
230301 |
220624 |
xb |
Switch cal attenuators:7,7->3,2db | 220627 |
220624 |
230301 |
220607 |
xb |
new diode, attenuators installed on polA,B outputs (7,7)db | 220607 |
220607 |
220623 |
220607 |
sb |
attenuators installed on polA,B outputs
(3,2)db |
220607 |
220607 |
220623 |
220606 |
sb |
diode now on peltier cooler.attns not
installed, no measurements done |
|||
220527 |
sb |
sb diode with no temperature
stabilization. |
220601 |
220408 |
220606 |
220117 |
xb |
measured cals using sky and
absorber peltier cooler installed 08nov21. |
220120 |
211108 | 220607 |